Research Article

A Cross-disciplinary Corpus-based Analysis of the Frequency and Syntactic Positions of Adverbials

Pouya Vakili
Illinois State University, USA.
* Corresponding author
Reda Mohammed
Case Western Reserve University, USA.
DOI icon 10.24018/ejlang.2022.1.6.43

Read Counter
460

Downloads
270

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-10-22
Published 2022-11-21

Read counter = 460 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Adverbials have been studied numerously by different linguists and have been classified and categorized differently across time by different syntacticians (Bellert 1977; Cinque 1999; Ernst 2002; Delfitto 2007) and semanticists (Ernst 2002; Bonami et al. 2004; Jackendoff 1972). However, all these studies have been conducted in discipline-specific domains. To fill this gap, the main focus of this study is to investigate the frequency of adverbials and their syntactic positions. For this purpose, we have designed our study to be on academically published research articles (RAs) in two hard sciences of Medicine and Engineering, and two soft sciences of Literary Studies and Linguistics. The results indicate that Literary papers have the greatest number of adverbials with 102 and Medical papers have the lowest with only 39 adverbials. In fact, this frequency of adverbials can show the direction of each discipline. When a discipline is based on facts, the researchers use more factual language rather than descriptive one to illustrate the real world. However, human sciences make all attempts to describe the world in which people live so they need a more descriptive language to fulfill their purpose. In terms of position, looking at the eight positions proposed by Quirk et al. (1985), the Medial position is the most favorite of all. In addition, End and Initial positions have second and third popularity in turn. In total, adverbials, due to their flexibility and free movement in sentences, belong to a very complicated class of words that require more research. Furthermore, writers should consider the objectives of their discipline in order to decide what type of adverbials to use and in which position.

Keywords: adverbials, academic papers, adverbial syntax, adverbial semantics, adverbial positions.

References

  1. Bateson, F. W. (1972). The scholar-critic: An introduction to literary research. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  2. Bellert, I. (1977). On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 337–351.
     Google Scholar
  3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
     Google Scholar
  4. Bonami, O., Godard, D., & Kampers-Manhe, B. (2004). Adverb classification. Handbook of French semantics, 143–184.
     Google Scholar
  5. Cargill, M., & O’Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific articles: Strategies and steps.
     Google Scholar
  6. Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press on Demand.
     Google Scholar
  7. Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (The Language Library). John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.
     Google Scholar
  8. Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2011). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Santa Barbara. Cal. USA: Greenwood.
     Google Scholar
  9. Delfitto, D. (2007). Adverb classes and adverb placement. In Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , pp. 83–120. Blackwell Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ernst, T. (2002) The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
     Google Scholar
  11. Espinal, T. (1991), The representation of disjunct constituents. Language, 67(4):726–762.
     Google Scholar
  12. Greenbaum, S. (1969) Studies in English adverbial usage. London and Harlow: Longmans. Green and Co Ltd.
     Google Scholar
  13. Greenbaum, S., Quirk, R. (1990) A student’s grammar of the English language. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hasselgård, H. (2010). Adjunct adverbials in English. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  15. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572.
     Google Scholar
  16. Hoye, L. (1997). Adverbs and modality in English. Longman, London
     Google Scholar
  17. Huddleston, R., Pullum, G. K. (2002) The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  18. Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
     Google Scholar
  19. Maienborn, C. (2001). On the position and interpretation of locative modifiers. Natural language semantics, 9(2), 191–240.
     Google Scholar
  20. Maienborn, C., & Schäfer, M. (2011). Adverbs and adverbials. Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, 2, 1390–1420.
     Google Scholar
  21. Mohammed, R., & Vakili, P. (2021). Using ideologically loaded concepts as a tool for reversing folk-notions of linguistic & cultural diversity. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching.
     Google Scholar
  22. Morzycki, M. (2016). Modification. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  23. Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A concise grammar of contemporary English. Harcourt School.
     Google Scholar
  24. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language text. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, GN Leech, J. Svartvik-London: Longman.
     Google Scholar
  25. Smith, C. (1991). The parameter of aspect Kluwer academic publishers. Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
     Google Scholar
  26. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
     Google Scholar
  27. Swales, J. M. (2009). When there is no perfect text: Approaches to the EAP practitioner's dilemma. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 5–13.
     Google Scholar
  28. Trask, R. L. (2003). Language: the basics. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  29. Vakili, P. (2020). Review of the book The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives by M.Hundt; S.E.Pfenninger; S.Mollin (eds.). https://linguistlist.org/issues/32.1347/.
     Google Scholar
  30. Vakili, P., & Mohammed, R. (2020). Grammar scares me: an exploration of American students’ perceptions of grammar learning. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(12), 124–135.
     Google Scholar
  31. Vakili, P., & Mohammed, R. (2021). Invitation accepted: international students as a pedagogical source to increase American students’ WE awareness. Journal of applied languages and linguistics.
     Google Scholar
  32. Vakili, P., (2022). Give me the rules, i’ll understand grammar better: exploring the effectiveness of usage-based grammar approach through explicit instruction of adverbials. Theses and Dissertations, 1626. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1626.
     Google Scholar
  33. Vlach, F. (1993). Temporal adverbials, tenses and the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy, 231–283.
     Google Scholar
  34. Wyner, A. Z. (2008). Toward flexible types with constraints for manner and factive adverbs. In Louise McNally & Christopher Kennedy (eds.), Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
     Google Scholar