Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot: The Dual Motif
Article Main Content
Following two world wars, the human essence was affected by pessimism and a loss of faith. As a result, new existentialist literature was produced, resulting in a new wave of absurdist fiction plays. The theatre of the absurd was first termed by Martin Esslin, whereas the term ‘absurd’ was first used by Albert Camus in his classic essay ‘The Myth of Sisyphus’. Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot,” a tragic comedy, (1952) is among the most mysterious dramas of the twentieth century that represents the philosophy of absurdism. By adopting the philosophy of theatre of the absurd in analyzing “Waiting for Godot,” this study focuses on Beckett’s employing the dual motif in the plot of the play and its implications, represented in chances that play a significant role rather than logic in the characters’ lives. As a result, the study concludes that Beckett’s use of such a technique underlines the equal opportunities in the world of the play, where chances have their effects on humans; Godot might or might not come, and the characters might leave or not: illustrating the unpredictability of the real world.
References
-
Beckett, S. (2011). Waiting for Godot: a tragicomedy in two acts. Retrieved from: https://resources.saylor.org/wwwresources/archived/site/wpcontent/uploads/2011/01/Waiting- for-Godot.pdf.
Google Scholar
1
-
Bloom, H., & Hobby, B. (2010). Dark Humor. InfoBase publishing.
Google Scholar
2
-
Camus, A., & Ballerini, E. (2019). The myth of Sisyphus. WF Howes Limited.
Google Scholar
3
-
Chambers, C., & Prior, M. (1987). Playwrights' progress: patterns of post-war British drama. Amber Lane Press.
Google Scholar
4
-
Cornwell, N. (2006). The Absurd in Literature. Manchester University Press.
Google Scholar
5
-
Debata, P. K. (2013). The dynamics of absurdity in Samuel Beckett’s waiting for Godot. New Academia, 1, 59–62.
Google Scholar
6
-
Esslin, M. (1961). The theatre of the absurd. Doubleday.
Google Scholar
7
-
Haney II, W. S. (2001). Beckett out of his mind: The theatre of the absurd. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 34(2), 39. Retrieved from: http://ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly- journals/beckett-out-his-mind-theatre-absurd/docview/198199494/se-2?accountid=10226.
Google Scholar
8
-
Hinchliffe, A. P. (1969). The Absurd. Methuen.
Google Scholar
9
-
Kruse, A. (1975). Tragicomedy and tragic burlesque: Waiting for Godot and Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead. Sydney Studies in English, 1.
Google Scholar
10
-
Maroufi, S. (2017). A discourse-stylistic analysis of Harold Pinter’s Victoria station: Simpson’s three ss model as a sample [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oran].
Google Scholar
11
-
Oteiwy, G. O. (2012). Language in Waiting for Godot. Adab Al-Kufa, 1(14). http://e-biblio.univmosta.dz/bitstream/handle/123456789/567/Soumia%20Maroufi%20Presentation.pdf?sequence=1.
Google Scholar
12
-
Power, C. (2008). Presence in play: a critique of theories of presence in the theater. New York.
Google Scholar
13
-
Tan, T. (2007). Existentialism and Samuel Beckett’s two plays: endgame and happy days [Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University].
Google Scholar
14
-
Withanage, I. H. (2011). Waiting for Nothing; an Analysis of “Waiting for Godot” by Samuel Beckett [B. A dissertation, University of Iceland].
Google Scholar
15
-
Zhu, J. (2013). Analysis on the artistic features and themes of the Theater of the absurd. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), 1462–1466.
Google Scholar
16





