Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
* Corresponding author
Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

Article Main Content

The objective of this research is to describe the social facts of language and power in the linguistic landscape in Gresik, East Java, Indonesia. This study applies a qualitative design to descriptively examine phenomena in the realm of shake agents, in this case the government in this case the government and society. LL studies and ethnographic studies are used for the purposes of studying the social context to direct deeper discussion. Data gathering is done by documenting public areas and observing people’s attitudes. From the results of observations and studies of meaning as well as observations of the context of power, an explanation is obtained that there are information functions and commercial functions displayed in LL. Authorization in language is carried out by using terms that show that Islamic identity is attached to the area and gives a view of the value of blessing and sanctity. This encourages the tourism industry. Educatively, LL is important for knowledge about history in the younger generation. In LL, it is described the government’s efforts, beliefs, and the expansion of people’s language attitudes which also use the same paradigm as the use of phrases and words that refer to Islamic nuances. From this research, we can understand that a social paradigm, including religion, is used for various purposes according to how the belief exists. Impact appears as a result of direction. This form of direction uses language. Language is the power to shape views that produce greater impact.

References

  1. Abdullah, C. U., & Wulung, S. R. P. (2021). Spatial patterns of linguistic landscapes in tourism areas. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(5), 4298–4308.
     Google Scholar
  2. Blackwood, R. (2015). LL explorations and methodological challenges: Analyzing France’s regional languages. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1–2), 38–53.
     Google Scholar
  3. Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity (Vol. 18). Multilingual Matters.
     Google Scholar
  4. Dabbour, K. (2017). The linguistic landscape of Tahrir Square protest signs and Egyptian national identity. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 142.
     Google Scholar
  5. De Beaugrande, R. (2006). Critical discourse analysis: History, ideology, methodology. Studies in Language & Capitalism, 1(1), 29–56.
     Google Scholar
  6. Duizenberg, Max Ronald. (2020). Linguistics landscape: A cross culture perspective. Linguistics and Culture Review, 4(1), 15–28.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fabiszak, M., Buchstaller, I., Brzezińska, A. W., Alvanides, S., Griese, F., & Schneider, C. (2021). Ideology in the linguistic landscape: Towards a quantitative approach. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 405–425.
     Google Scholar
  8. Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gravells, J. (2017). Semiotics and verbal texts-how the news media construct a crisis.
     Google Scholar
  10. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of language and social psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
     Google Scholar
  11. Lou, J. J. (2016). Jan Blommaert, Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2013. Pp. xiv, 127. Pb.£ 17.95. Language in Society, 45(3), 455–458.
     Google Scholar
  12. Mulyono &Wuryaningrum, R. (2021). Ideological meaning of lamongan batik motifs (Semiotic Perspective). International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 8(12), 6726–6734.
     Google Scholar
  13. Shohamy, E. (2019). Linguistic landscape after a decade: An overview of themes, debates, and future directions. Expanding the linguistic landscape: Linguistic diversity, multimodality and the use of space as a semiotic resource, 25, 37.
     Google Scholar
  14. Stroud, C., & Mpendukana, S. (2009). Towards a material ethnography of linguistic landscape: Multilingualism, mobility and space in a South African township 1. Journal of sociolinguistics, 13(3), 363–386.
     Google Scholar
  15. Wodak, R. (2002). Aspects of critical discourse analysis. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik, 36(10), 5–31.
     Google Scholar
  16. Wolf, N. M. (2014). An Irish-speaking island: State, religion, community, and the linguistic landscape in Ireland, 1770–1870. University of Wisconsin Pres. Dabbour, K. (2017). The linguistic landscape of Tahrir Square protest signs and Egyptian national identity. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 1(2), 142.
     Google Scholar